Re: [Simulator] On scheduled events

Michael Rogers wrote:

> Jano wrote:
>> I'd not say it's, per-se, unrealistic, although there are certainly many
>> use cases to be studied.
>> 
>> Should we start categorizing them? Perhaps we could use the wiki.
> 
> At some point we should definitely work on more realistic traffic
> models, but for the moment I'd be happy just to get rid of the OOMs.
> I'll have a go at modifying SimplePublisher so it doesn't inform the
> readers until the insert starts.

Thinking about this, we could perhaps slightly change the consumer model
and, instead of generating ten events at once, generate one for the first
reader and when it triggers, generate one event at a time for the next
reader. This way we reduce by a factor of ten the pending events.