Re: Proposal: UP&P

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Florent Daignière (NextGen$) wrote:
> * Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> [2007-03-06 01:37:52]:
> 
> > However:
> > - It would significantly improve connection reliability. If for example
> >   all your peers are german and in germany all domestic IPs change every
> >   24 hours, if you are down for 24 hours you are lost for good.
> 
> Do we have any stats regarding how many of our users are double-natted?
> I know that in france most people had DSL connectivity before the
> Wireless craze ; meaning that most users are likely to have two
> different natting appliances (the routing modem and the wireless AP).

You are quite sure that it isn't possible to break out of a double-NAT?
> 
> > - Right now good connectivity relies on getting a few geek nodes - nodes
> >   that are directly connected or port forwarded. UP&P would increase the
> >   proportion of such nodes dramatically.
> 
> I am not sure it's an issue. I am idling on #freenet-refs on a regular
> basis to see how the installer performs and to see where users get
> stuck : most of them don't have connectivity problems.

Not initially. The problem here is that somebody gets a few references,
they're all in Germany so their addresses are recycled every 24 hours.
They take their node offline for a couple of days for whatever reason.
They bring it back online and they have no connectible peers.
> 
> > - It would allow for all sorts of bootstrapping protocols. One-time
> >   references are the tip of the iceberg: Anything that involves giving
> >   your details well in advance of the actual connection attempt will be
> >   greatly helped by UP&P support.
> 
> Will be greatly helped if UP&P works : indeed.

Right.
> 
> > - It would (mostly) eliminate the need to rely on centralised STUN servers.
> 
> it's assuming there is no double nat : again ;)

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF7Z1FA9rUluQ9pFARAhjiAJ9ZvYhXXS8j59T9q5MQKomeuTp4hQCgl1g7
dQMyJp2OJvUV5puGgtJFkK4=
=NfX6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.