Re: GSoC Proposal

Florent Daignière (NextGen$) <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Sback <sback-vy/[email protected]> [2007-03-20 15:03:11]:

> I think that with a QEmu machine it should be simpler because we can
> "pack" everything
> in a single executable that will start up a system that can be take care
> of everything involving
> a good functioning of a Freenet node. I mean it would be really easier
> to perform auto-update
> for both the freenet code and the Java Virtual Machine.

Well, we want him to keep the datastore accross updates!

NextGen$

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF//E9U/Z/dHFfxtcRAqTaAJ9p/snurPyAukxUJnMw8IZWD4r5zgCg4F7x
LHpaWFpEeXrgo1ypvl6K7Uk=
=cfDe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.