Re: Cache and Store
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 12:03, Michael Rogers wrote: > On a related note, is there any evidence that LRU performs better than, > say, random replacement for Freenet's purposes? IIRC there's some > evidence that LRU in a distributed cache produces too many copies of > popular data: > > http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~qlv/download/searchp2p_ics02.pdf > http://gnunet.org/papers/p2pmulti.pdf No evidence that I know of but feel free to investigate. > > Cheers, > Michael _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGQehAA9rUluQ9pFARAp5RAKCrpP5L364J+ESNfvZwuLjAeGO/JwCgnBSy /P3zcojrCGZOzSm9m3PrOmU= =CeZP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----