Re: Cache and Store
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 10 May 2007 21:38, Bob Ham wrote: > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 00:36 +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 May 2007 20:28, Bob Ham wrote: > > > That was what I proposed near the start of this thread. I would note, > > > as well, that the store-shrinking code should already exist for cases > > > when the user reduces the configured size of the store. > > > > It does, but as I have already stated at least once, it is difficult to > > efficiently do an online shrink while preserving the most recently used > > data. > > > > It is of course possible. One way to do it is to swap the key you'd be > > deleting with the least recently used key just before truncating. > > What's your point? The point is that as presently implemented we have two ways to shrink a store: - Online, fast, doesn't preserve most valuable data. - Offline, slow, does preserve most valuable data. Obviously the latter is preferred but we can only do it on startup. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGQ4y8A9rUluQ9pFARAiZGAJ9mv7FB5hcDfkUZKfK/mCXfBHPRdQCePZyy yVkfx5Fh1u0SrqTVZ0NjsWg= =EtSs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----