Re: Cache and Store
Bob Ham <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1178888912.3916.4.camel@localhost> |
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 12:42 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote: > * Bob Ham <[email protected]> [2007-05-11 08:19:49]: > > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 22:47 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote: > > > * Bob Ham <[email protected]> [2007-05-10 21:45:59]: > > > > > > > This is a real cognitive problem showing up right there. It isn't your > > > > responsibility to second-guess the user. There are valid reasons for > > > > the node to have this functionality. The only reason for it not to is > > > > to inhibit users. That's what Microsoft do. > > > > > > Indeed... and experience has shown that it works. > > > > What do you mean "it works"? What does it work to do? > > > > Shall I remind you that > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > ... > hence > I'm against letting him play with the ratio of the cache/store. You didn't answer the question. What do you mean "it works"? Bob _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech