Re: Cache and Store

Florent Daignière <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Bob Ham <[email protected]> [2007-05-11 16:40:44]:

> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 15:25 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > * Bob Ham <[email protected]> [2007-05-11 14:08:32]:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 12:42 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > > > * Bob Ham <[email protected]> [2007-05-11 08:19:49]:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 22:47 +0200, Florent Daignière wrote:
> > > > > > * Bob Ham <[email protected]> [2007-05-10 21:45:59]:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This is a real cognitive problem showing up right there.  It isn't your
> > > > > > > responsibility to second-guess the user.  There are valid reasons for
> > > > > > > the node to have this functionality.  The only reason for it not to is
> > > > > > > to inhibit users.  That's what Microsoft do.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Indeed... and experience has shown that it works.
> > > > > 
> > > > > What do you mean "it works"?  What does it work to do?
> > > > > 
> > > > ...
> > >
> > > You didn't answer the question.  What do you mean "it works"?
> > 
> > I did in the part you've stripped. Inhibiting users seems to be
> > something that most of them like.
> 
> I couldn't see anything relating to inhibiting users in the part that I
> stripped.  Also, I'm still not sure what the answer to my question is.
> 
> Perhaps I'm not making myself clear.  There's a goal which you're saying
> is achieved by inhibiting users (at least that's what I understand by
> the phrase "it works.")  What is the goal?  What does inhibiting users
> achieve?

Improving the usability, providing them  an interface like they are used
to. Not  inhibiting them would  force us  to document what  side effects
changing that setting might have; It's not something we want to dedicate
ressources on doing.

NextGen$

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGRJVoU/Z/dHFfxtcRAoF5AKD0yajyMv1C9gLGY8Nfh6AVwv6HqQCgpB4t
33UTs6Lya0aLwbmGsvyHPsM=
=1zi8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.