Re: Cache and Store
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 11 May 2007 01:15, Juiceman wrote: > I would make it an expert option and put in sanity checks to make sure > the ratio never goes outside 10 to 1 and each store is at least 32MB. > The default would still be 50% > > My reasoning is, I run a 18GB datastore and there is no way my node > could serve up 9GB of cached data without overloading my bandwidth and > probably starving requests that could hit the specialized store. > > What do you think? What exactly are you trying to do here? Increase the size of the store at the expense of the cache? Your node should be able to deal with a 250TB store. If it doesn't there is something wrong with the system. Many of these parameters have network-wide effects: The rules are not the same as when you are writing a word processor, because you are building a self-organising network, not a standalone device. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGSf4FA9rUluQ9pFARAkBWAKDBrx/aq7Qd0wU23Q9l+LW1gFHuBgCeOHBX lcPTjv6/Oz3a8tNNmM0e6Qk= =jQoI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----