Re: Cache and Store

On Thursday 17 May 2007 09:45, Bob Ham wrote:
> > > > > > It is of course possible. One way to do it is to swap the key
> > > > > > you'd be deleting with the least recently used key just before
> > > > > > truncating.
> > > > >
> > > > > What's your point?
> > > >
> > > > Obviously the latter is preferred but we can only do it on startup.
> > >
> > > I'm still unsure as to why you're telling us this.  Is your point that
> > > work still needs to be done on store shrinking?
> >
> > No, it's that dynamically shrinking the cache as the store grows isn't
> > feasible without additional work on shrinking.
>
> Erm.. it isn't feasible without additional work on itself, either.  Your
> point is completely redundant.  No code is feasible without its
> dependencies.

The point is, it's significant work and not a priority right now.
>
> Bob

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGTcy3A9rUluQ9pFARAvoxAKC14Qdd8GVTt8Ze10is+2dc8BhjJACgmHqW
nCXJavPiOLs6qPTSWil/s+0=
=+wSF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----