Re: Position randomization

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 17 August 2007 15:22, vive wrote:
> As a side note, I have looked through the freenet opennet implementation.
> It seems like 5 minutes is a minimum time having a connection before being
> able to drop it for another destination sampling, if a node has accumulated
> the max 15 opennet peers already. (So if destination sampling happens to
> produce some clustering for a while, it may be there for a period, as with
> the speculation above.) Swaps are initiated every 2 seconds if not locked,
> on the other hand. Are the opennet values experience from previous
> implementations or under some current experimentation? :-)
> (when I originally tried to understand destination sampling, it was
> depending on probabilities for rewiring rather than times)

The time limits are there simply to limit connection churn to a reasonable 
level, by giving nodes a chance to prove themselves before we dump them.
>
> Best,
> /Vilhelm

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGxzOVA9rUluQ9pFARAiLUAKCCmUnDFkVH5rVeKe4O8owaaLPC/QCffQla
Hjc3jIHyvpu/g8wvzXWh0cQ=
=wVJA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.