Re: Position randomization

vive <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 02:47:31PM +0200, vive wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:19:29PM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:
> > vive wrote:
> > Here's a thought experiment: take a Kleinberg network and shuffle the
> > locations. Then replace the nodes one by one with new nodes, using the
> > current locations to calculate the connection probabilities. When all
> > the nodes have been replaced, don't you have a Kleinberg network again?
> 
> I claim you don't. It will be more alike a random graph. But indeed, if
> you think so then try to simulate it. :)

I read your mail once again and I misunderstood what you meant here the
first time. Yes, it should become a Kleinberg network again. (But I've
not changed my mind on the other questions. :)

regards,
Vilhelm

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGyZKxSriVunoG9oYRAvbSAJkB/fgTUcVCMaoRcR6lcfMpw3dxQwCfcG37
mahspdmZ/zdlCM+pbMsMWcI=
=i6qU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.