Re: Position randomization
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 20 August 2007 14:49, Michael Rogers wrote:
> >
> > This scenario corresponds roughly to many nodes that are alive in the
> > network and a small flow through of positions by nodes joining but decide
> > to leave for good. Some results soon...
>
> OK, I guess we have different ideas about churn - in your model it's
> always the new nodes that leave, whereas in my model every node leaves
> eventually (though not necessarily after an equal amount of time).
I believe vive's assumption is more than reasonable. We have a significant
amount of newbie churn ("I tried it out and it sucked so I uninstalled it",
this is supported by our download stats), whereas established users will
generally stay for a long time.
_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGyesDA9rUluQ9pFARAn2SAJ40DDT+SlZ7hmsneO6yTnPX7F3ZIwCgnBYP LYy45FUQBegYXjSjJfOWocU= =ZDNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----