Re: Fcp notes and issues
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 02 December 2007 04:24, Juergen Urner wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > > Well, in the current API, you can either come up with a unique name, or not > > have any client-name-specific state i.e. either have no persistent requests > > or store them all on the global queue. I don't see how any other solution > > would help - if you start persistent requests, exit, another client steals > > your name, you give way to that client, then you'll have lost them. > > ...or another client may flood mine with leftover requests. Very > unlikely case, but no > magic either if some future version of the protocol would equip clients > to handle > their own persistence. There is nothing I can do about this afaics. If you need persistent non-global requests then USE A UNIQUE NAME. If not, then use a random name. > > Thanks for listening, Juergen _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHU/fIA9rUluQ9pFARAt6lAJ4uyImA7J0T4IoqQqWPJc8VoHPZIwCguBpy k6YT+up7X9f4fgsrqxtWzVY= =Dc9H -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----