Re: Opera JPEG vulnerability
juergen urner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marco A. Calamari schrieb: > On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 18:51 +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> This is interesting because it came at the end of a thread on Frost where the >> OP was arguing that Freenet shouldn't filter JPEGs. (Freenet strips out EXIF >> data and other unknown chunks from JPEGs on download to maximize security; in >> the future we will do something similar on inserts). >> > > IMHO changing in any way information inserted in Freenet *must* > be documented, evident in user interface, up by default > but easily user selectable. > > Is it really up to Freenet fixing issues in software people may use along with it? Sounds like opening a can of worms with scarce devel time at hand. If it is a problem related to fproxy, let fproxy deal with it. Or tell users not to use Opera. As I see it, Freenet has a tendency of mixing node and client stuff a bit too much. My 2 cents, Juergen