Re: Hash cash keys

No complains from anyone? So we can expect this feature soon?

On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 9:05 PM,  <bbackde-gM/[email protected]> wrote:
> This sounds like a good idea! No matter who uses it (fms, frost, thaw)
>  could at least be sure
>  that the sending costed the sender some cpu time. It could also
>  restrict the amount of sent messages
>  at all, considering the same cpu time. So it becomes more expensive
>  and annoying for the spammer.
>  Now its quite easy for him, he could even play crysis in parallell ;)
>
>
>
>  On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Michael Rogers <m.rogers-kecf2yCh/[email protected]> wrote:
>  > bbackde-gM/[email protected] wrote:
>  >  > If I understand this correct, the node of the sender will have to
>  >  > compute a valid
>  >  > hash cash before actually sending the key? And receivers can easily check the
>  >  > hash cash and reject keys without a valid hash cash?
>  >
>  >  Right - inserts without valid hash cash won't even be forwarded.
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  Cheers,
>  >  Michael
>  >  _______________________________________________
>  >  Tech mailing list
>  >  [email protected]
>  >  http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>  __________________________________________________
>  GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
>  Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
>  Fingerprint:
>  477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
>  __________________________________________________
>



-- 
__________________________________________________
GnuPG key:   (0x48DBFA8A)
Keyserver:   pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de
Fingerprint:
477D F057 1BD4 1AE7 8A54 8679 6690 E2EC 48DB FA8A
__________________________________________________