Re: FMS (Java) design

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Monday 03 March 2008 17:20, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> > On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:40, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
> >> The client decides what to fetch with the informations given by the WoT
> >> plugin. It then asks it to the FMS plugin and it works as Martin
> >> described in another post.
> >>
> >> The only issue I see here is that we would have to create 2 SSKs per
> >> user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff (messages...).
> > 
> > No, each user must have entirely separate publications. Otherwise an 
attacker 
> > can identify that two users share the same plugin / the same node.
> 
> I don't understand your point. Of course each identity should have its
> own SSK for publications. What's the problem if the same plugin fetches
> messages for all its clients ?

"we would have to create 2 SSKs per user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff"

I misunderstood this. But it's unnecessary anyway, you can use the same SSK 
and change the document name.

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHzH1LA9rUluQ9pFARAlJWAKCFe1S+xwP4XjG60ftKEZpv7aD5UgCfeXpI
LV+ETlg7G4Eeta3dmkgiGtg=
=+oNd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.