Re: FMS (Java) design
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 03 March 2008 17:20, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > Matthew Toseland a écrit : > > On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:40, Julien Cornuwel wrote: > >> The client decides what to fetch with the informations given by the WoT > >> plugin. It then asks it to the FMS plugin and it works as Martin > >> described in another post. > >> > >> The only issue I see here is that we would have to create 2 SSKs per > >> user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff (messages...). > > > > No, each user must have entirely separate publications. Otherwise an attacker > > can identify that two users share the same plugin / the same node. > > I don't understand your point. Of course each identity should have its > own SSK for publications. What's the problem if the same plugin fetches > messages for all its clients ? "we would have to create 2 SSKs per user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff" I misunderstood this. But it's unnecessary anyway, you can use the same SSK and change the document name. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHzH1LA9rUluQ9pFARAlJWAKCFe1S+xwP4XjG60ftKEZpv7aD5UgCfeXpI LV+ETlg7G4Eeta3dmkgiGtg= =+oNd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----