Re: FMS (Java) design

Matthew Toseland a écrit :
> On Monday 03 March 2008 17:20, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>> Matthew Toseland a écrit :
>>> On Sunday 02 March 2008 21:40, Julien Cornuwel wrote:
>>>> The client decides what to fetch with the informations given by the WoT
>>>> plugin. It then asks it to the FMS plugin and it works as Martin
>>>> described in another post.
>>>>
>>>> The only issue I see here is that we would have to create 2 SSKs per
>>>> user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff (messages...).
>>> No, each user must have entirely separate publications. Otherwise an 
> attacker 
>>> can identify that two users share the same plugin / the same node.
>> I don't understand your point. Of course each identity should have its
>> own SSK for publications. What's the problem if the same plugin fetches
>> messages for all its clients ?
> 
> "we would have to create 2 SSKs per user : one for the WoT, one for FMS stuff"
> 
> I misunderstood this. But it's unnecessary anyway, you can use the same SSK 
> and change the document name.

I must have misunderstood something with how SSK works. Do you mean it's
possible for the plugin to insert a new edition without knowledge of
other files in it (FMS files) ? If so, can you explain how ? I'm
interrested.

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHzYeFalr61WGRfZARApaLAKDGVYVzc+gt0rUZM/cv1djouRVs6ACgikl5
IBcD8wnhKpqak/JaSuLKh7U=
=ywC7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----