Re: Outside web access?
Stephen Walford <stwa4647000-/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am thinking of running a personal web server as a semi-public proxy alongside Freenet on the same computer. My idea is to allow outside http access to a select number of Freenet sites through through the fproxy via this server. Firstly, would this setup even work? And secondly would I be able to configure it from within Freenet to allow http requests and forwarding to and from the fproxy? Also, I am considering using an imbedded web server of the likes of Jetty - http://jetty.mortbay.org/index.html to fulfil this purpose. The website claims that Jetty is embeddable in a wide variety of web applications, but again I seek the opinion of Freenet's experts as to whether or not it would work in this instance. --- On Thu, 28/2/08, John Bäckstrand <[email protected]> wrote: From: John Bäckstrand <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Tech] Outside web access? To: stwa4647000-/[email protected], [email protected] Date: Thursday, 28 February, 2008, 8:40 AM Stephen Walford wrote: > Is there any way possible for someone to access Freenet sites with a web > browser WITHOUT first having installed the Freenet software, ie. general > http access? If not, will future developments in Freenet facilitate this? Not unless someone opens up a public fproxy I guess, and who would want to? Actually I considered this not more than 8 hours ago, when thinking about the wikileaks "takedown"/censoring. It went something like this: People _really_ should start using freenet for this sort of information. The problem is that people are too lazy to install freenet "just" too see some sensitive information. Hey, I should open up a http proxy for freenet, and then manually add filters when government agencies start complaining. The filtered pages would simply say: "please install freenet to see this page, since the legal system has asked me not to show this". The hope is that by moderating things manually, I would not be prosecuted for anything (hopefully) and people will at least get a chance to see information before it is banned. Removal of domainnames though, as for wikileaks, is really not a working measure as can be seen by the numerous alternative domain-names now up instead. So, the internet, for the moment at least, seems to do sort-of-fine without freenet. For this sort of information, at least. --- John Bäckstrand _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech ---------- Sent from Yahoo! Mail . A Smarter Inbox. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech