Re: Distributed file system using routing inspired by Freenet
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 17:13, Michael Rogers wrote: > I've recently done some simulations of LRU vs FIFO vs random replacement, > but I haven't had time to write up the results yet. The short version is > that random replacement performs better than LRU or FIFO for some > workloads, and isn't significantly worse for any workload. I didn't > simulate multi-block files or FEC, though. Any ideas why? Did you simulate a two layer store, a plain cache, or a plain store? > > Cheers, > Michael _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH/TtuA9rUluQ9pFARAsVtAJ9lTqbDChpEXKTBBWWRsekx3/spFwCfTpGH QoMPTvFCYQsNsNrmZoFRhfI= =vbLa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----