Re: Switch Repository to Git
Florent Daignière <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Daniel Cheng <[email protected]> [2008-07-02 23:34:29]: > 2008/7/2 Florent Daignière <[email protected]>: > > * Daniel Cheng <[email protected]> [2008-07-02 23:21:45]: > > > >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Jano <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > David 'Bombe' Roden wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Tuesday 01 July 2008 06:02:06 NextGen$ wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> We all agree that that merging things from branches back and forth is not > >> >>> easy with svn 1.4... but it will be easier when we will upgrade to a > >> >>> merge-tracking enabled version. > >> >> > >> >> In subversion it will always be a cludge, though, because subversion wasn't > >> >> designed with repeated merges in mind. > >> > > >> > Have you read the svn 1.5 release notes? You'd still call it a kludge? I'm > >> > honestly asking, I'd like to know from someone used to git. > >> > >> While I love using git, I am more interesting in DSCM then any > >> specific SCM. The ability of commit locally and work offline allow me > >> to test out my idea more freely. > >> You know, everybody have some crazy idea that he want to test without > >> letting others to see. > >> For instance, I have yet another experimental database and an > >> alternative location swapping code locally. > >> > >> A (good) side effect is the ability to work offline. > >> > >> Easy merge management is just a side effect of DSCM -- DSCM encourage > >> branching and forking. That's why every DSCM comes with a set of good > >> merging tools. > > > > That's my point: at this stage we don't want to encourage branching nor > > forking. > > The tools make this easier does not means we have to encourage it. > Sure but why should we make it easier if it's not to encourage it then ? :) > > We need the network to be homogeneous version and bug-wise to be debuggable > > and to move forward. > > Anyway, you can't stop me (or anybody else) from using git-svn locally > (and I am using it). > I have no problem with you (or anybody else) using the tools they want. I just don't want brazillion of incompatible/forked clients to spawn up in the wild and to connect to the main network. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIa6ikU/Z/dHFfxtcRAuByAJ4m3WNxes/f0k0cqeXYDn2PWlmIywCgzZBa qvlktLiTFc/TFD745UBYViA= =xTuG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----