Re: Switch Repository to Git

Florent Daignière <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Edgar Friendly <[email protected]> [2008-07-02 19:46:34]:

> Florent Daignière wrote:
> > I have no problem with you (or anybody else) using the tools they want.
> > I just don't want brazillion of incompatible/forked clients to spawn up
> > in the wild and to connect to the main network.
> 
> Reflecting on this idea, I think it'd be good (in the long run) if this
> did happen.  Of course the network would get disrupted, but I thought
> that the idea of Freenet was to have a disruption-resistant network.
> And a brazillion forks means many new developers trying changes.  If the
> project doesn't reject their changes, they would become a great force
> for building a better Fred.
> 
> OTOH, without DSCM, forked clients will still exist, it'll just be
> tougher to keep them up to date and to merge any improvements back to
> the official client.
> 
> $0.02 from an oldie,
> 
> E.

Heh, I'm not against the idea here; I'm just being pragmatic: we don't
have the resources to deal with forked clients.

NextGen$

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIbCJGU/Z/dHFfxtcRAtvrAKDd+f/kGWPq8IaBGWA1Wv7mNPzZhQCeIwEO
UQTwBS+4aZtbcydprvlClw4=
=AzDR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.