Re: Switch Repository to Git
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 03 July 2008 01:50, Florent Daignière wrote: > * Edgar Friendly <[email protected]> [2008-07-02 19:46:34]: > > > Florent Daignière wrote: > > > I have no problem with you (or anybody else) using the tools they want. > > > I just don't want brazillion of incompatible/forked clients to spawn up > > > in the wild and to connect to the main network. > > > > Reflecting on this idea, I think it'd be good (in the long run) if this > > did happen. Of course the network would get disrupted, but I thought > > that the idea of Freenet was to have a disruption-resistant network. > > And a brazillion forks means many new developers trying changes. If the > > project doesn't reject their changes, they would become a great force > > for building a better Fred. > > > > OTOH, without DSCM, forked clients will still exist, it'll just be > > tougher to keep them up to date and to merge any improvements back to > > the official client. > > > > $0.02 from an oldie, > > > > E. > > Heh, I'm not against the idea here; I'm just being pragmatic: we don't > have the resources to deal with forked clients. It's an emergent system, 100 clients each with slightly different behaviour will kill it. > > NextGen$ _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIbp1rA9rUluQ9pFARAnBYAJ9TfSFA+YbC3SGyfZjv+I2RCq93XQCdGKPv CCVlq90x8YGQSpY2di6tbqQ= =fBej -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----