Re: Defining Freenet was Re: Darknet, uptime, and true passive requests
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 17 July 2008 22:15, Michael Rogers wrote: > Matthew Toseland wrote: > >> Small, isolated darknets connected to the main network by camel > >> caravan? > > > > I would certainly like to support this if it is possible, and if the > > characteristics of the resulting network don't make it pointless. > > >>> And longer term it'd be great if we could have e.g. audio > >>> streams. > > I've got this mental image of RealPlayer "buffering" while a camel plods > across the Sahara with the next block of data. :-) LOL. :) IMHO real time and non-real-time are not mutually exclusive. > > Cheers, > Michael _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBIf8nyA9rUluQ9pFARAgvmAJiKPE/lsLJ28phfh8RqBzv3KNL+AKCX4Vyb vxLpsBnrE/2pofef6QN2Fg== =Ami/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----