Re: Random walks

"Daniel Cheng" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
2008/10/4 Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>:
> On Saturday 04 October 2008 02:23, Daniel Cheng wrote:
>> 2008/10/4 Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>:
>> > On Friday 03 October 2008 17:27, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> >> Can't remember whether this has been raised before, but a random walk
>> >> terminates at a given node with probability proportional to the node's
>> >> degree; does this mean high-degree nodes are more likely to receive swap
>> >> requests than low-degree nodes? Seems like that could be disruptive in
>> >> two ways:
>> >>
>> >> 1) When a high-degree node changes its location, many other nodes are
>> >> affected.
>>
>> If you/vive/oskar are looking at the the degree thing... please review
>> this as well:
>>   http://code.bulix.org/20bjpk-68537
>>
>> This patch remove the opennet location from swapping --
>> essentially seperating the darknet and openet.
>
> Why would that be beneficial? You're still treating them as the same for
> routing purposes?

darknet links are stable, opennet links are not.
swapping should depends on (and only depends on) something stable,
or the location won't be stable.

>> >> 2) There might be some correlation between degree and other properties:
>> >> high-degree darknet nodes might belong to committed users with large
>> >> stores, in which case it's particularly disruptive if those nodes keep
>> >> moving.
>> >>
>> >> Just a thought.
>> >
>> > I don't know. This looks like a question for vive/oskar.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Michael
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tech mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tech mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.