Re: Random walks
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sunday 05 October 2008 08:31, Daniel Cheng wrote: > 2008/10/4 Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>: > > On Saturday 04 October 2008 02:23, Daniel Cheng wrote: > >> 2008/10/4 Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]>: > >> > On Friday 03 October 2008 17:27, Michael Rogers wrote: > >> >> Can't remember whether this has been raised before, but a random walk > >> >> terminates at a given node with probability proportional to the node's > >> >> degree; does this mean high-degree nodes are more likely to receive swap > >> >> requests than low-degree nodes? Seems like that could be disruptive in > >> >> two ways: > >> >> > >> >> 1) When a high-degree node changes its location, many other nodes are > >> >> affected. > >> > >> If you/vive/oskar are looking at the the degree thing... please review > >> this as well: > >> http://code.bulix.org/20bjpk-68537 > >> > >> This patch remove the opennet location from swapping -- > >> essentially seperating the darknet and openet. > > > > Why would that be beneficial? You're still treating them as the same for > > routing purposes? > > darknet links are stable, opennet links are not. > swapping should depends on (and only depends on) something stable, > or the location won't be stable. Possibly. But then we have to figure out how to route between independant networks, which we haven't solved yet. > > >> >> 2) There might be some correlation between degree and other properties: > >> >> high-degree darknet nodes might belong to committed users with large > >> >> stores, in which case it's particularly disruptive if those nodes keep > >> >> moving. > >> >> > >> >> Just a thought. > >> > > >> > I don't know. This looks like a question for vive/oskar. > >> >> > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Michael _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 827 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUASOo97nsvjZi+xPTDAQIeww/+PXO+gNr6NHTF7SisZtyETZJwsSjgL+sZ dr5QmrsMAXBnmDUW1+r2wupVK7b9HTRrcClkbK84javWecOZAXvBUkauxYfuVjtD 2C7bYHmlkweFqVJr/H+8z0fc8uQrXA53C+CJSe2vyl1/dIZWlKaEu5NKi9y4jOKG 759ig+hwPk3u6Z6uf7xCKVGA7EIQu3pBRKUeqa8o/C9/3Nd7NcBjGhlVq0Qrj4JL yfsESM0kNDBpH0zQg9JviPntrsdypxJzPbbwAzdPYJjZCrN2iM1uPzj3KLN/TiwL grrKrp7U1TZojSBRSxroHnC3KD9SgfB6zCqnBgPd+DghhYPT1y3kkF4rzb2BzHfU Ors5vVjQFGP6VfPbznN4sLAIurF9KXjeKSJkZpcoQS3UM83uRlqYYsJEtdI5h0uE pbq+L9yBUfIhBXypLqTtzNpkDcrY7lzI8yYYBsSWpV9bZiIIM+/7uJxShZ8fn90t Gem8MJOJgp7TIvxLzlKwK0l2sL0QAfl/ArhqH1DelSiqc8Wrii6tYIKhI8gKVoLC B1VxL54QL1cbG2cYpj+Az/DgboAMGIoJR57zkc3VH6K/2asMtAmMpCBoBabGsddI oxyhs0wVeKkX+9HTjHIaSRpxvSsMf1Qtjwqvit9vnRTdYkwK9x4O55UMAt1SM4k/ NQ1Sz1WrKJY= =yl7C -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----