Re: Feature request, from FMS
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:38:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 11:00, Florent Daigniere wrote: > 3BUIb3S50i 3BUIb3S50i wrote: > > md@BngcNVtC0qdeg2HmgSSs8jHVbYAomT8nQ0Pvx1NQ0Ks wrote: > >> How do I delete a freesite? I changed the name but I don't know how to > >> delete the "old" version. > > > > saces@foqoipX8V3aio7B~tNoxFmRutrcVHixhlAXB2WpFoeU wrote: > >> delete is an importand feature for censorship, so such operation does not exist in freenet. > > > > falafel@IxVqeqM0LyYdTmYAf5z49SJZUxr7NtQkOqVYG0hvITw wrote: > >> This raises an interesting question: > >> > >> On the regular internet, you have HTTP error codes to indicate different > >> statuses of freesites: > >> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes > >> > >> In particular: > >> > >> 301 Moved Permanently > >> This and all future requests should be directed to the given URI. > >> > >> I think Freenet needs to provide a way for a freesite to trigger FProxy > >> to send a 301 redirect to the browser, and also a corresponding redirect > >> in FCP. > >> > >> It confuses things somewhat that FProxy talks to the node using some > >> hidden internal protocol - I think it should be more separate from the > >> node and use FCP to communicate with the node. > >> > >> In particular, we want freesite spiders and indexing engines to know that > >> the old site is dead and to include the new URL instead. When we get > >> clever about it, it can be used to retain the original site's ranking too. > >> > >> How could such a thing be done? > >> > >> What if you just reinsert the site as a redirect to the new freenet URI? > >> This would appear in FCP to be distinct from a mere redirect to a newer > >> version of the same key. > >> > >> Does that make FProxy send a 301 redirect message to the browser? > > > > The Tech mailing list is the place where we discuss long-term, freenet > related issues; Not the place where users are expected to make feature > requests. > > Please stop it. You'd rather they made them on devl? > > NextGen$ _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 827 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUASX8AVnsvjZi+xPTDAQKfuA//dcwIX3CS5ZUnC2Zl8QirE2dVHOMFT/EW egDyK0WY0kK7IcMd8QTOSiXdBR8aAmAYZv1nWt9gfp2Nr5zBYg7bxzWIallegGiK 5pvYh6QGIoRCmEANVoxIbumLL790KrgV2YxBxnmgjb6XhAsJT/jirJYSLxkpCdkX 0Us04uLoEg+j5wnV6mW/Iu+/hvar4GTUV+8JFCWY9oIugm48aDgCXFIEoIPYgcwb joiR/YKBvkaYgc+iKgONi/FUed/SDRIcx07+PuJLiEIz/stY3k/pvI+hB6Sk42kl 7ZcmR6IWZ/yRKQi+qwnzsctTBEd4lf2j9gWeIUMUMacraPPc0HgVYEzzXNASP3ci ow9esgp3cVu/y9HAQ7DA/2EomNsFfKbCBm3/9PIdlSuAhzykEG0GQ8tHxOe9zN7i QQWAxjKj3ViZ1MNYJHcSLkyKevPc9TvhCBxV+XlNa//QGkYtfdzvvFT4/BQXDozd 3CDhfIFvwnYTd3NpQgk4VfI9//wwVEiGFql+fFOQi+vseER+6HI+KFEuwWGZ/2RG txsKiwX88HL7EL1oxGeNyajw/2+NGFxgW8k+6y8XHifwGyh0iqx8TkAN6aSo04nG f21lq7PTPFxBZPb4TBJRQGUZhP9MGb3Y6v3GG4QniX5/ltllhofIGx5HrD95qpYG vxkGY6eSzew= =VLP9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----