Re: Freenet usage, goals, and Iran
Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:31:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freenet.technical |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 16 June 2009 21:58:12 Zero3 wrote: > Matthew Toseland skrev: > > But yes, inserting the two main installers into an SSK sequence and having nodes download them and allow users to download them *locally* is a good idea; this isn't a distribution servlet, it isn't open to the wider world, but it allows them to get an installer to send to their friend, even if they installed months ago, lost the original installer, and the route by which they obtained the installer is now closed. > > It's not a bad idea IMHO. Makes sure that Freenet can survive on its own > even if freenetproject.org is seized. Should be revokable though. Agreed, this could be related to the auto-update system. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 835 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJKOPAfAAoJEHsvjZi+xPTDMn4QAJJ8tOMs4ofzkcwZO4gpgaUq YhXIynz5qYSV7ONEfArMGCLJ8XCcza5BoAlZCuy9nWRvMXG9+0piFhnrs+UAdbCJ tFTDN+OQUfUkUiZUkkHSrQ/p/YzkoaGL1NHlGGO9+Q9FfgHxZOpFDen+R7cixzyG X+pGpCAW9gPivs6yimTmjpgF0eov9nOvVsiiYYqOuT/Hn9OOR6XhhlfeAEZTYcV8 LdysMIUi6NoIA71Ol44zhfZzqptLKdCkF2e/8bgCC8RV8AVGnqkNbTYONOOwjKLB SbNuCVQfnxlU3HMM8uIEp/JfaFy8aHZCQiOlOC4y00WEv+gFmQxezW+Ze7MbDySv N+7+4i8nqBtH7r2uDkARe01rjOTPoEN4UI2WnsPBgs3RU0d4WB8U2+FIp600QkbD rf2dMxgREEFDbXE3xAwhat2gSHlnrQt11UeNNrTK0DzKrc7Y60nSHeIQcDTrzCS7 JA+ilLcjkuklVu4Fl/am1G8gnWOJvkhPpjrnC37NbTiksxnBxcmo+krh1L1EDLCz kjwTBEL0twBNRB/kwpJByxdYLA1Y9vGCFQpLho4FXYJmbF5dTdoyYVvQ/+XK+3Zt Hg3V4UspD/vjQW1Er/zTFYSlXK8iLeFJR+mlmmgIPOoJVuYR5ux1Zl/IEBqBaPUl 987UwZ0jc+VPpm/4kCzz =7QlQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----