Voltage problems lead to exploitable RSA weakness

Matthew Toseland <toad-EI5O+8PHWbJeeLb3ft/[email protected]> Wed, 5 May 2010 20:30:48 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.freenet.technical
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Maybe we should always check signatures after generating them if the seclevel is sufficiently paranoid?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8637845.stm

_______________________________________________
Tech mailing list
[email protected]
http://osprey.vm.bytemark.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABEIAAYFAkvhx2kACgkQYUNbc3WUHYgl+gCgrjqcHczejLTtLMG1ONQHlMjq
Lp8AoJMiQEad4/jYIAVIYWDVYHwMMaw2
=CZIU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----