Re: The 2.00 code fails a MAJOR user acceptance test
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "Hugh" == Hugh Daniel <[email protected]> writes: Hugh> I then tar'ed up and removed ipsec.conf and the ipsec.d directory Hugh> tree and then started up FreeS/WAN again. This time I can't talk This is definitely a problem. It was supposed to be the case that if "private-or-clear" is empty that we consider it to have 0.0.0.0/0. This appears to have gotten lost when we switched from "OEself" to "private-or-clear" ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Finger me for keys iQCVAwUBPlAOiYqHRg3pndX9AQFPCAP/UFFYzQTZlrix8FSPAOPCpVTLa7phr5CS vboHFZxeNMc8GL/0tL2ZzjVlykYZBTP43zr7af0OpEcri/1ohhZY41cwPtqN2BPA b2/91AXWvvohc3sQ9JQECv4+ruXHNYCctZcYAzaufNjrRyPuS19pj+/zBDpBTtSn zJEoMEqAp6Y= =VXYp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----