Re: Disabling Policy Groups
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:38:20 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>> "Claudia" == Claudia Schmeing <[email protected]> writes: Claudia> In your experience, would it help to have mynet= setting(s) in Claudia> conn Claudia> %default? These might define subnet/s which would use the Claudia> gateway's own policy Claudia> groups for their own configs. Well, three problems that I can see with this: 1) the implicit conns do not reference %default. 2) if we put it in %default, it would affect all conns, including the "self" conns. 3) we may be doing OE for multiple subnets, so we really need a list. What I'd prefer to have is an implicit conn that looks like: conn private type=tunnel left=%defaultroute leftsubnet=%opportunisticsubnet leftrsasigkey=%dnsondemand rightrsasigkey=%dnsondemand right=%opportunisticgroup failureshunt=drop auto=route also=OEdefault Where %opportunisticsubnet is like %opportunisticgroup, except that it reads a set of CIDRs from, say, /etc/ipsec.d/networks/private. The files, if empty, need to contain the equivalent of %defaultroute for "private-or-clear" group, i.e. just myself. ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Finger me for keys iQCVAwUBPlGAeoqHRg3pndX9AQEO4gQAz7sxnIupl5krUeT8hA3YzoolGe5WD2cd WE60YttxRuJrRAe8AIHn/pyWwSTtVpBfah1QbHEfGJaFDQmocCq0AvYpXtIlISDJ J4HteOH25JWibh0OTVC6f9/kQGzaQAywhDEkQvyNQsfI/zY7sPc1JmJQZrjRc8R1 4qxm2cZ+pvo= =mL0X -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----