RE: pfkeyv2 : proto feild in address extension
"Kaustubh Kumbhalkar" <[email protected]> Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:10:37 +0530
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi
the protocol and proto level granularity has been provided by andreas
steffen in his x.509 patch , which was the one used by iabg for its new
release of ipsec6 with certificate support ( i suppose ). then weren't
these functionalities included .
thanks and regards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The greatest pleasure in life is doing
what people say you cannot do.
~ Walter Bagehot ~
"Gessler Gerhard"
<[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
cc:
07/02/2003 07:11 Subject: RE: [Design] pfkeyv2 : proto feild in address extension
PM
Hi,
we (IABG) did not implement further pfkeyv2 code for handling port and
protocal as Pluto (the FreeS/WAN IKE-daemon) was not able to negotiate SAs
with that granularity at that time.
I think Pluto is still only able to do this with an additional patch, if my
memory serves.
Hope this helps,
Gerhard
--------------------------------------------
Gerhard Geßler
Communication Networks, IABG mbH
Einsteinstr. 20
85521 Ottobrunn, Germany
Telefon: +49 89 6088 - 2021
Fax: +49 89 6088 - 2845
E-Mail: [email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 1:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Gessler Gerhard
> Subject: [Design] pfkeyv2 : proto feild in address extension
>
>
> hi
> while trying to add protocol entry into the sadb from used
> space i saw in
> the pfkeyv2 code that the proto element within the address
> extension has
> not been used.The pf key v2 RFC also gives it as a MUST
> condition, that
> the transport layer protocol should be given within the
> proto feild of the
> address extension.
>
> i wanted to know why proto field within the address
> extension has not been
> used by freeswan to implement protocol level granularity, i
> havent tried
> doing this myself yet, so i wanted to enquire if there are
> some problems to
> it.
>
> thanks and regards.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Design mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>