Re: Re: delete-sa-01 test

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 [email protected] wrote:

> > Mathieu: given that both SAs are in the process of being deleted, is there a
> > logic to not sending a delete for the IPSec SA as well?
> 
> Both SA should be deleted, and the IPSec SA should be deleted before the
> ISAKMP SA because it uses it for encryption.

Hmm... this may bear further investigation - perhaps the patch didn't port to 
2.00 as effortlessly as we thought.

- -- 
Sam Sgro
[email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.

iQCVAwUBPkM+KUOSC4btEQUtAQEiJwQAg77JUaCnluYgHd7x1iBmio2PibWxG/zk
VR8T3xFBLWrqzrgezQLripe1aNU7DmwdXRzRzYZZByTO55DGHHNtYL9KJh5eBF4D
//rT6GsGB5zlWSExNHVFW/Q1DWOMxXogAICoHuIHBZ/dTQiGT6F9a1y5fJkW3FQ0
MJaNIJ2+wgc=
=4MoC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----