Re: [Design] Re: Opportunistic Encryption is now working under Linux 2.5

"David S. Miller" <[email protected]> Mon, 26 May 2003 15:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups gmane.linux.network.general,gmane.network.freeswan.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
   From: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
   Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 07:28:50 +1000

   On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 04:01:39PM -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
   > I have some questions/comments:
   > 
   > 1) do we really need linux/include/rtnetlink.h? Shouldn't this
   >    be coming from the kernel headers?
   
   Yes.  You can't include Linux kernel headers directly in a user-space
   application as they're not guaranteed to compile in user-space.

That's hogwash, including linux/rtnetlink.h and linux/xfrm.h are the
only sane ways you can get at the IPSEC userspace APIs right now.

Or do you suggest that we should wait for GLIBC to get these in it's
headers?  That's fine, you can wait and meanwhile the rest of us evil
people including kernel headers in user applications we get the use
the IPSEC stack :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html