pfkeyv2 : proto feild in address extension
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hi while trying to add protocol entry into the sadb from used space i saw in the pfkeyv2 code that the proto element within the address extension has not been used.The pf key v2 RFC also gives it as a MUST condition, that the transport layer protocol should be given within the proto feild of the address extension. i wanted to know why proto field within the address extension has not been used by freeswan to implement protocol level granularity, i havent tried doing this myself yet, so i wanted to enquire if there are some problems to it. thanks and regards.