Re: protocol/port in Phase 1 ID Payload must be 0/0 or 17/500

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


| From: Sam Sgro <[email protected]>

| D. Hugh Redelmeier's explanation:
| 
| http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/design/2002-January/001810.html

An even more clear response:
	<http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/2003-January/017808.html>

On the surface, this appears to be a bug in Cisco's IKE
implementation.  It has shown up on our lists at least since January.
Has anyone reported it to Cisco?

If not: why not?  I'm not a Cisco customer or even user so I'm not the
best guy to report it.  I'm loath to add a bug to FreeS/WAN (yes, bug:
read Stephen's message) to compensate for a bug in Cisco's code.

If so: what has their response been?  Is there a configuration fix for
the Cisco end?  Is there a software update fo fix it?  Have they
claimed that this is not a bug?

Hugh Redelmeier
[email protected]  voice: +1 416 482-8253

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBP6UguMFAuQPManGZAQEeNAP/XlNch/gZ85c/aoJxnSZEG3G+UL+70GvV
cdt9WW4SvIFFbPxaRUHmXRtvq5cmPKFbB8DAQSVNvkaJ9DRr5pDAiXd1zOxsCnBL
He34gV9GigGQousMd8ONQMR7uHUY7QA/2Ijpx7tzb+aGlztNxe4wuvtkUHgIl3zf
ikxR+mNfm1k=
=gFmo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----