Re: pfkeyv2 : proto feild in address extension
Andreas Steffen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | strongSec GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Super FreeS/WAN available from http://www.freeswan.c supports port and protocol selectors in IPsec SAs. Regards Andreas [email protected] wrote: > hi > while trying to add protocol entry into the sadb from used space i saw in > the pfkeyv2 code that the proto element within the address extension has > not been used.The pf key v2 RFC also gives it as a MUST condition, that > the transport layer protocol should be given within the proto feild of the > address extension. > > i wanted to know why proto field within the address extension has not been > used by freeswan to implement protocol level granularity, i havent tried > doing this myself yet, so i wanted to enquire if there are some problems to > it. > > thanks and regards. ======================================================================= Andreas Steffen e-mail: [email protected] strongSec GmbH home: http://www.strongsec.com Alter Zürichweg 20 phone: +41 1 730 80 64 CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland) fax: +41 1 730 80 65 ==========================================[strong internet security]===