Re: pfkeyv2 : proto feild in address extension

Andreas Steffen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freeswan.devel
Organization strongSec GmbH
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Super FreeS/WAN available from http://www.freeswan.c supports port and
protocol selectors in IPsec SAs.

Regards

Andreas

[email protected] wrote:
> hi
> while trying to add protocol entry into the sadb from used space i saw in
> the pfkeyv2 code that the proto element within the address extension has
> not been used.The pf key v2  RFC also gives it  as a MUST condition, that
> the transport layer protocol should be given within the proto feild of the
> address extension.
> 
> i wanted to know why proto field within the address extension has not been
> used by freeswan to implement protocol level granularity, i havent tried
> doing this myself yet, so i wanted to enquire if there are some problems to
> it.
> 
> thanks and regards.

=======================================================================
Andreas Steffen                   e-mail: [email protected]
strongSec GmbH                    home:   http://www.strongsec.com
Alter Zürichweg 20                phone:  +41 1 730 80 64
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)   fax:    +41 1 730 80 65
==========================================[strong internet security]===
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.