Re: Announce: FreeS/WAN Project Ending
"John A. Sullivan III" <[email protected]> Mon, 01 Mar 2004 14:38:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.user,gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1078169927.2007.0.camel@localhost> |
Speaking as a user, thank you very much all you FreeS/WAN people!!! You're work has been very much appreciated - John On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 14:05, Claudia Schmeing wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Dear FreeS/WAN community, > > > After more than five years of active development, the FreeS/WAN project will be > coming to an end. > > The initial goal of the project was ambitious -- to secure the Internet > using opportunisitically negotiated encryption, invisible and convenient > to the user. (for more, see http://www.freeswan.org/history.html). > A secondary goal was to challenge then-current US export regulations, > which prohibited the export of strong cryptography (such as triple DES > encryption) of US origin or authorship. > > Since the project's inception, there has been limited success on the > political front. After the watershed Bernstein case (see > http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Crypto_export/Bernstein_case/ ) > US export regulations were relaxed. Since then, many US companies have exported > strong cryptography, without seeming restriction other than having to notify > the Bureau of Export Administration for tracking purposes. > > This comfortable situation has perhaps created a false sense of security. > The catch? Export regulations are not laws. The US government still > reserves the right to change its export regulations on short notice, and > there is no facility to challenge them directly in a court of law. This leaves > the US crypto community and US Linux distributions in a position which seems > safe, but is not legally protected -- where the US government might at any time > *retroactively* regulate previously released code, by prohibiting its future > export. This is why FreeS/WAN has always been developed outside the US (in > Canada and in Greece), and why it has never (to the best of our knowledge) > accepted US patches. > > If FreeS/WAN has neither secured the Internet, nor secured the right of US > citizens to export software that could do so, it has still had positive benefit. > > With version 1.x, the FreeS/WAN team created a mature, well-tested IPsec VPN > (Virtual Private Network) product for Linux. The Linux community has relied > on it for some time, and it (or a patched variant) has shipped with several > Linux distributions. > > With version 2.x, FreeS/WAN development efforts focussed on increasing the > usability of Opportunistic Encryption (OE), IPSec encryption without > prearrangement. Configuration was simplified, FreeS/WAN's cryptographic > offerings were streamlined, and the team promoted OE through talks and outreach. > > However, nine months after the release of FreeS/WAN 2.00, OE has not caught > on as we'd hoped. The Linux user community demands feature-rich VPNs for > corporate clients, and while folks genuinely enjoy FreeS/WAN and its > derivatives, the ways they use FreeS/WAN don't seem to be getting us any > closer to the project's goal: widespread deployment of OE. For its part, OE > requires more testing and community feedback before it is ready to be used > without second thought. The project's funders have therefore chosen to withdraw their funding. > > Anywhere you stop, a little of the road ahead is visible. FreeS/WAN 2.x > might have developed further, for example to include ipv6 support. > > Before the project stops, the team plans to do at least one more release. > Release 2.06 will see FreeS/WAN making a late step toward its goal of being > a simple, secure OE product with the removal of Transport Mode. This in > keeping with one of Neils Fergusson's and Bruce Schneier's security > recommendations, in _A Cryptographic Evaluation of IPsec_ > (http://www.counterpane.com/ipsec.pdf). 2.06 will also feature KLIPS > (FreeS/WAN's Kernel Layer IPsec machinery) changes to faciliate use with the > 2.6 kernel series. > > After Release 2.06, FreeS/WAN code will continue to be available for public use > and tinkering. Our website will stay up, and our mailing lists at > lists.freeswan.org will continue to provide a forum for users to support one > another. We expect that FreeS/WAN and its derivatives will be widely deployed > for some time to come. > > It is our hope that the public will one day be ready for, and demand, > transparent, opportunistic encryption. Perhaps then some adventurous folks > pick up FreeS/WAN 2.x and continue its development, making the project's > original goal a reality. > > Many thanks to the wonderful folks who've been part of the lists.freeswan.org > community over the last few years. Thanks to the developers who've created > patches and written HOWTOs. Thanks to the volunteers who've donated Web space > and time as system administrators. Thanks to the distributors who've puzzled > out the fine points of integrating our software with others'. Finally, thanks > to the users who've tested our software, shared interoperation success stories, > and given others a helping hand. We couldn't have done it without you. > > > Best Regards, > > Claudia Schmeing > for the Linux FreeS/WAN Project > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.3ia > Charset: noconv > > iQCVAwUBQEOI23DIYXPDEHodAQG1VAP/cy4kK4oRV73YzIokEhElnbg841v/fKN5 > v6s//gi/1zfJWVrG2uX9X4ZMi0ebQGFN0J5zr/rhsy2fYcdlDJyaiQvFqyFzzrk9 > XUAIYjI+tdB/Fu8StfdutPf29ZdT6igOHI54uH4kYOXtIpj1b/H21SsZEPR+dni3 > eZSNoxgDQNo= > =iLJC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > FreeS/WAN Users mailing list > [email protected] > https://mj2.freeswan.org/cgi-bin/mj_wwwusr -- John A. Sullivan III Chief Technology Officer Nexus Management +1 207-985-7880 [email protected] --- If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class VPN/Firewall/Security device management console, please visit http://iscs.sourceforge.net