possible 1.xx to 2.xx issue
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Sam, Claudia, An issue that some users may run into, which I just ran into, and I'm not certain exactly why, is that they may have programs in /usr/local/lib/ipsec (which are 1.xx) and /usr/local/libexec/ipsec (2.xx). The "ipsec" driver program is careful to look in libexec first, so this should not be an issue. I do not quite understand what is up here, but I thought I'd give you a heads up. ] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[ ] [email protected] http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[ ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Finger me for keys iQCVAwUBPj64GIqHRg3pndX9AQFMnQQAqc14yZhJG9J7KNF8ZkZ8a7jPoETv5nsZ bbNRfAhuhRjhEEUQN2pLDhgLogf3RtVyaW10rtk7uAcJx/3GwJyqO+o03ztvEp4F H9l8EF0/oj/kP6NhvvBqqzco9D95ZEAUH7Eg1GNR/adsvjBgvtlD/39In8RpANFL dDG2FpKgcuM= =n/eY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----