Re: Strange trouble

Andrew Polyakov <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.freeswan.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Philipp Snizek wrote:

>	To me this doesn't seem to be an ipsec problem. 
>	I also think this no ipsec problem. Because 2 days 
>	ago all works well . And this connection works about 
>	2 months and I don't watch any problems. And now 
>	connections works correct but slow  :) I think maybe 
>	it is a routing problem. 
>
>That's what I'd have guessed. Did your ISP change routing (peering) ?
>what does your traceroute rtt say? can you make a traceroute?
>I did one to toyota.jp with a not surprising result that rtt was 300+
>ms.
>  
>
I ask my ISP of both ipsecs ends and they say that routing doesn't 
change last time. I can make traceroute, but of course i don't see gates 
between security gateways.
=======ipsec traceroute========
 traceroute to x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x)  4755.764 ms *  2751.385 ms
=======ipsec traceroute==========
======ping with ipsec==================
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% loss, time 29198ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1299.917/7651.921/30311.911/6237.503 ms, pipe 10
                                                                        
             ^^^^^^^
======ping with ipsec==================

======ping without ipsec=======
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% loss, time 29290ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 129.409/174.170/384.088/46.435 ms
======ping without ipsec=======

=======no ipsec traceroute=====================
traceroute to x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
<skip gatways dump>
9  x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x)  140.442 ms  142.002 ms  140.482 ms
=======no ipsec traceroute=====================

I can't understand why rtt with ipsec and without ipsec differ so much. 
I ask my ISP, and  they say - that routing with ipsec and without  ipsec 
is identical.


>		What distro do you use?
>	Linux RH 7.3 (2.4.21) on both ends + FreeS/WAN 2.05.
>
>Should be no trouble here. You had to patch the kernel then. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.