Re: Strange trouble
Andrew Polyakov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.freeswan.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Philipp Snizek wrote:
> To me this doesn't seem to be an ipsec problem.
> I also think this no ipsec problem. Because 2 days
> ago all works well . And this connection works about
> 2 months and I don't watch any problems. And now
> connections works correct but slow :) I think maybe
> it is a routing problem.
>
>That's what I'd have guessed. Did your ISP change routing (peering) ?
>what does your traceroute rtt say? can you make a traceroute?
>I did one to toyota.jp with a not surprising result that rtt was 300+
>ms.
>
>
I ask my ISP of both ipsecs ends and they say that routing doesn't
change last time. I can make traceroute, but of course i don't see gates
between security gateways.
=======ipsec traceroute========
traceroute to x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 * * *
2 x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x) 4755.764 ms * 2751.385 ms
=======ipsec traceroute==========
======ping with ipsec==================
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% loss, time 29198ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1299.917/7651.921/30311.911/6237.503 ms, pipe 10
^^^^^^^
======ping with ipsec==================
======ping without ipsec=======
30 packets transmitted, 30 received, 0% loss, time 29290ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 129.409/174.170/384.088/46.435 ms
======ping without ipsec=======
=======no ipsec traceroute=====================
traceroute to x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
<skip gatways dump>
9 x.x.x.x (x.x.x.x) 140.442 ms 142.002 ms 140.482 ms
=======no ipsec traceroute=====================
I can't understand why rtt with ipsec and without ipsec differ so much.
I ask my ISP, and they say - that routing with ipsec and without ipsec
is identical.
> What distro do you use?
> Linux RH 7.3 (2.4.21) on both ends + FreeS/WAN 2.05.
>
>Should be no trouble here. You had to patch the kernel then.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>