Codespell report for "GNUnet" (on fossies.org)

Fossies Administrator <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Sep 2020 20:53:45 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnunet.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi "GNUnet"-team,

the FOSS server fossies.org - also supporting "GNUnet" - offers among 
others a feature named "Source code misspelling reports":

  https://fossies.org/features.html#codespell

Such reports are normally only generated on request, but as Fossies 
administrator I have just created (for testing purposes) such an analysis 
for the new "GNUnet" release:

  https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gnunet/codespell.html

That version-independent (not linked) URL should redirect always to the 
last report (if available), so currently to

  https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gnunet-0.13.3.tar.gz/codespell.html

Although after a first review some obviously wrong matches ("false 
positives") are already filtered out (ignored) please inform me if you 
find more of them so that I can force a new improved check if applicable.

Just for information there are also three supplemental pages
  https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gnunet/codespell_conf.html
showing some used "codespell" configurations and
  https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gnunet/codespell_fps.html
showing all resulting obvious "false positives" and
  https://fossies.org/linux/misc/gnumet/codespell_hist.html
showing changes regarding found spelling errors compared to previous
analyzed versions.

At first glance, there doesn't seem to be a serious bug and most errors 
are "only" in code comments, but some errors are also contained in output 
strings and are so visible to users.

Although the correction of misspellings and typos has probably not a top 
priority, I hope that the report can nevertheless be a little bit useful.

Regards

Jens

-- 
FOSSIES - The Fresh Open Source Software archive
mainly for Internet, Engineering and Science
https://fossies.org/