Re: Question about GNS record representation in json

"Schanzenbach, Martin" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:24:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnunet.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This may be a bug/oversight.
The reason may be that shadow records must be ignored by the resolver 
and are never returned as part of a resolution process.

If you have any use or require a symmetric API, then this can be changed.
Feel free to modify the code accordingly.

Note that the REST service is in dire need of a rewrite (see 
https://www.gnunet.org/en/gsoc.html "Pluggable REST service components").
So, if you have some spare time you can check that out as well :)

BR
Martin

On 12.08.24 17:10, fence wrote:
> Hewo,
> 
> Is there a reason why GNUNET_JSON_GNSRECORD_FLAG_SHADOW is only 
> deserialised but never serialised?
> 
> Is that a bug or was the functionality removed and still being parsed in 
> case an old client still sending the flag?
> 
> kind regards,
> fence
>