Re: Question about GNS record representation in json
"Schanzenbach, Martin" <[email protected]> Tue, 13 Aug 2024 13:24:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnunet.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This may be a bug/oversight. The reason may be that shadow records must be ignored by the resolver and are never returned as part of a resolution process. If you have any use or require a symmetric API, then this can be changed. Feel free to modify the code accordingly. Note that the REST service is in dire need of a rewrite (see https://www.gnunet.org/en/gsoc.html "Pluggable REST service components"). So, if you have some spare time you can check that out as well :) BR Martin On 12.08.24 17:10, fence wrote: > Hewo, > > Is there a reason why GNUNET_JSON_GNSRECORD_FLAG_SHADOW is only > deserialised but never serialised? > > Is that a bug or was the functionality removed and still being parsed in > case an old client still sending the flag? > > kind regards, > fence >