Re: Minimum viable GNS deployment
"Schanzenbach, Martin" <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Feb 2022 15:19:02 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnunet.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Chris, please note that current git master contains protocol breaking changes to GNS (and the DHT) which may result in odd behaviour in the current network. So, in case you are using git master, I suggest testing locally or in a private network. Other than that: What Christian said. BR Martin > On 3. Feb 2022, at 20:18, Chris Joel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm interested in trying out GNS as a name system for an application I'm making. I have played around a little bit with Gnunet, but I'm still very new to it and I still have a lot to learn about its architecture and configuration. > > I understand that Gnunet runs many services that have a hierarchical dependency relationship. I was wondering two things: > > What is the minimum set of services needed to run a viable GNS peer? > > ...and... > > What is the best way to configure Gnunet to only run those services needed for GNS? > > Kind regards, > > Chris Joel
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPREGPBD5jRS9JNFHCwmY74b1m2oFAmH/5uYACgkQCwmY74b1 m2qTgBAAiVJyiIIeVC43ZI5kBBLmkIAYDn65QLOxHEl3q00BRGq2ap4OOJ74IYIs NWG6dVr4vtSkmzMRvXvRJm/07/CpMYS77j7Q0aVJAJ0guiWzGCTDUbF+f/uCM2RT 88iJ7vvtlf9FuOwQb70U18uHjgDpJT3n3a08nTKgQ8HAGR0zL5o7FO/xyopwzZW8 6PBNryZNPmyjH6xSSd8zOiuKMpk69NpLVV2Jwukv50AWsGZXcNc3s+KzCuRwUYb+ GIp1gGReR/yKc3bP/CuXlh+19YGH7hcEdjySDHdymwfTVy/uFR53kMomWzH1AE9b 8bPJfynLVvOJXsuoG6Dix0a23liYz9aTyDWIGsm85OUJY+LIugDyepkF+n5yvR+e rthOC2TQy2dyEwNTqcS+8X5iG66u3dJnAQXqvVMrDAVyfRtwv8PRTSD9mxYrmc/N V4805qmJIeROa+7mjPORZRWr+W0eHfaJp9dxV0Dw2M/aUjIHSgbPSaMp+kWoH5wP 19/ovNMFrPSNiALGEzzc6iYPnnzr6pznGKN6Et1fq9cr6I8qIL59F3fpsc9BbraK bF+Znj+sv/yx5zK/kGZkVWTKHmvX7RSJ+PMx8g4QM8ko64vLOlifb4TnikwAmAQG IYJxi7Cx36MiKtSLlaROzb62pC+bfpMwOrTMNH2lRjlgje+Wlws= =5D3f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----