Re: Drop Dynamic Querying - It only benefits Spammers these days

"Elias Athanasopoulos" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutella.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello!

On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:54:54PM +0100, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> From: "Elias Athanasopoulos" <[email protected]>
> > On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 12:48:27AM +0100, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> >> Well, I personnally don't find spam as a real problem, given the antispam
> >
> > It is; it can be used to cause a DDoS attack.
> 
> Huh???? DDoS attacks are first based on the specification of a specific target,
> and being able to limit the traffic so that it will reach this target from
> everywhere.

http://www.csd.uoc.gr/~elathan/publications/gdos-paper-final.pdf
 
> Suppressing dynamic querying will not allow you to avoid reaching the spamming
> hosts. So you will still get their fake hits. Without dynamic querying, you'll
> reach in fact more spamming nodes, meaning that you'll be overflowed by even
> more fake hits.
> 
> So this is clearly not the solution to eliminate spammers.

I am not arguing on how to fight spam in Gnutella; unfortunately I have no
clue on that, I am arguing that the 'spam' problem, or even better: the 
ability to inject fake QueryHits in the system, is a *real* and *serious* problem. 

Regards,
-- 
Elias Athanasopoulos
Distributed Computing Systems (DCS)
Institute of Computer Science (ICS/FORTH)
Heraklion, Crete

A bug can become a feature by documenting it.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.