Re: Dynamic Querying solutions open for comments
Bill Pringlemeir <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- [email protected] wrote: > 1a. Dynamic Querying solutions open for comments > Posted by: "Arne Babenhauserheide" [email protected] arne_bab > Date: Tue Mar 20, 2007 4:52 am ((PDT)) > > - If a Leaf or UltraPeer sends an UltraPeer a HUGE list of (seemingly > good) query hits, search it last for future searches. "Chatterboxes" > aren't good for maintaining reasonable network traffic anyway. "http://infolab.stanford.edu/~byang/pubs/guess.pdf" This paper give some insight into different cache strategies for GUESS. Specifically, it list random, most recently used, least recently used, most files shared and most results. The results are only obtained via a network simulator. However, I think some conclusions are relevant to DQ; especially the chatterbox criteria. "Chatterboxes" may actually share a lot of relevant content. I certainly understand what is meant by people sharing useless content though. Perhaps nodes should monitor the hits to the QRP tables and decide to evict some entries on occasion [those downloaded many times and those never downloaded but advertised for a long period]. Btw, has LimeWire abandoned GUESS? Is GUESS returning less or more spam than DQ? fwiw, Bill Pringlemeir. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html