Re: Managing licenses in Gnutella
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Samstag, 24 de März de 2007 01:53 schrieb Philippe Verdy: > You want me to drop the acronym "DRM"; what I want is not that, I want to > give this acronym the true and necessary meaning "Rights Management"; I don't want you to drop it, because it is a wrong useage of the word, but because you're playing in the hands of thise who pervert the meaning of rights management, if you use it. You don't have millions of dollars for a marketing campaign to reclaim the term DRM, and you don't have civil rights groups who want to reclaim it. Instead you'll find, that civil rights groups fight the term DRM altogether, and that this is the best way for them to fight against bad practises. Most people wouldn't understand "DRM is useful, but what the big media does is not DRM but something else", but they understand "When the big media talks about DRM, they mean that they want to take away your computer". When you now create a DRM which doesn't control the computer and call it DRM, you weaken the stance of the civil rights groups, because they suddenly have to say "DRM is evil, except this one" or they have to fight you, too, and lose their ethical legitimation. So you can decide on your battle and think about the battle, which will allow you to accomplish your goal easier: Going against millions of marketing dollars and against civil rights groups and taking the risk, that you further the twisted cause of Treacherous Computing and Digital Restrictions Management (I intentionally use the FSF names for them), or taking the backdoor and implementing a system with another name, which isn't a red flag to everyone who ever read about the DRM which is done by big media. If your goal is to cleanse the name "DRM", then you'll have to go against big opposition. But if your goal is to implement a license management scheme, then you can have it easier by avoiding the name DRM, at least as long as you are small enough to be destroyed easily. If you manage to make that license management widespread and well-known, you can still decide to take a stance against treacherous DRM to cleanse the name. At least this is my understanding. Wishes, Arne PS: I called it receipt, because a receipt is easy to understand even for completely non-technical people, and because in germany we use receipts to testify for ownership, so the receipt works like a smaller license. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]