Re: Host caches and peer lifetime
"Zlatin Balevsky" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This didn't get reply, but is a good question - we have been unable to beat random selection of hosts, as high-uptime hosts are unlikely to have available connection slots. For a short while we would bias slightly towards newer hosts with free leaf slots, but that started creating some very weird "topological abominations" ;-) On Jan 6, 2007 10:38 AM, Michael Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Sorry if this has been covered before - do UDP host caches and > gwebcaches return a uniformly random selection of known peers? If so, > and if we can assume that peer lifetimes follow a distribution with a > heavier tail than the exponential distribution (ie old peers can be > expected to live longer than young peers), then would it make sense to > return old peers with higher probability than young peers? > > Thanks, > Michael > > http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~matei/PAPERS/ic.pdf > http://2003.iwcw.org/papers/bustamante.pdf > http://www.imconf.net/imc-2005/papers/imc05efiles/stutzbach/stutzbach.pdf >