RE: Re: Consider banning Lars Magne (from gmane.org and gnus.org) from this list
"Philippe Verdy" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Ordinateur Personnel |
| Message-ID | <01e601c858f3$84928070$0a01a8c0@HARNON> |
Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > El Tuesday, 8 de January de 2008 00:56:12 Aaron Walkhouse escribió: > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.network.gnutella.devel/12475/match=gnutella > > > > Dead link? > > Works for me. > > > The issue is the email addresses, remember? Yahoo does not display > > them in public for the spambots to harvest and gmane.org does. > > Maybe you could ask, if he could just remove the server part, as yahoo > does. I have asked him, he said he had done it, but lied. Nothing was changed: he absolutely wants us to use his web site to see where ever there may be links to out email addresses and signal him the message numbers. He really has not understood the problem: it would take hours or days to find most occurrences (remember: you'll need to scan many years of archives, something that bots can do very easily, but not us), without any guarantee of the result. He simply does not want to honor removal requests. > But as for the spam which suddenly hit the wiki, I'm not that sure, if > he'll > be responsive... > > Anyway: Blocking him won't make the spam go away. It will limit the impact, by avoiding new bots from running again on its web site, to refresh their old lists with "fresh" working addresses to target their spew when it does not generate enough revenue for the spammers. Why do they run bots? Just because feeding them with lists of addresses collected by others but full of non working addresses will ease the fast detection of spammers and their blocking. And blocking would clearly say to others that would try to repeat the same error that this is not tolerated. I did not ask to remove the messages, just to anonymize them at least by hiding the email address, like Yahoo does. This would not impact the archived content, but at least, there's no reason for him to archive private data that is normally hidden in the sources that he is copying. A mailing list is not meant to be archived and used by other people than just the subscribers at the time they receive the message. After this time, others may look at the content but don't need to know the addresses unless they want to subscribe to the mailing list itself and accept its policy in order to be able to write there. Mailing lists are not meant to authorize people to write to someone for unrelated subjects.