Re: Search by urn ??
"Aaron Walkhouse" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--- In [email protected], "neglacio" <neglacio@...> wrote: > > Limewire is currently the only client which UP's ignore hash-searches. > Because Limewire makes up the most of Gnutella, hash searching is > practically impossible on it. Not if you're using BearShare. I find it highly effective, especially with files that have multiple sources. Even when a file has only one source, if that source responds to hash searches I can often get a stalled download going again. As far as I know, LimeWire doesn't _block_ hash searches from passing through, but simply does not respond with hits. I hope LimeWire will eventually get over the hurdles they must pass in order to work with hash searches. I realize that upgrading query routing to meet the needed performance level may be more difficult in Java but sooner or later it will have bubble to the top of their deep todo list. ;]