Re: Re: DHT vs Gnutella
"Nikolay Raspopov" <[email protected]> Tue, 5 Aug 2008 22:43:03 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <A252CFC4CDF6470DBA4041FC97D79C72@noir> |
Hello, [email protected]! You wrote to <[email protected]> on Tue, 5 Aug 2008 15:43:21 +0000 (UTC): RM> Nikolay: we're not developing another DHT-like protocol. skip... RM> At present, I view the DHT as an evolution step for Gnutella. So you definitly invent new DHT-like protocol. :-D There are too many incompatible DHT-idea-based protocols: KAD, Azureus DHT, BitTorrent DHT, LimeWire DHT, DNS DHT etc... Every protocol uses for creating network itself and searching for some dayta (words, files) by "presave" methods (very long and unreliable "save procedure" but instant search). But gnutela is already stable network and CAN search for various data by "flood" method (no save at cost of longer search). So why we need to "betray" principle of flood-style network? With best regards, Nikolay Raspopov. E-mail: [email protected]