Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)
Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:33:54 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.network.gnutella.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 14:28:17 schrieb Michael Green: > > i think there is already a library, which protocol we could brand to > > > gnutella 3: > Well, you lost my vote just there ;-) That was my gut reaction, too. Especially the “we brand” part. I thought about using plain http (POST) as transport layer, so the basic model could stay the same, because I know how much effort went into finetuning and testing the advanced features in Gnutella. And I just realized, that even in that I wasn't clear enoug - and lost focus (I forgot to clearly say up front “this is less efficient than Gnutella, so I think it's useful mostly for specific applications which benefit from additional easy to use flexibility”). Best wishes, Arne [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]