Re: Re: Implementing a Gnutella-structured network only with basic HTTP possible?Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:08:15 +0000 (UTC)Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:55:15 +0000 (UTC)

Arne Babenhauserheide <[email protected]> Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:33:54 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.network.gnutella.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2010 14:28:17 schrieb Michael Green:
> > i think there is already a library, which protocol we could brand to
> 
> > gnutella 3:
> Well, you lost my vote just there ;-)

That was my gut reaction, too. 

Especially the “we brand” part. 


I thought about using plain http (POST) as transport layer, so the basic model 
could stay the same, because I know how much effort went into finetuning and 
testing the advanced features in Gnutella. 

And I just realized, that even in that I wasn't clear enoug - and lost focus 
(I forgot to clearly say up front “this is less efficient than Gnutella, so I 
think it's useful mostly for specific applications which benefit from additional 
easy to use flexibility”). 

Best wishes, 
Arne


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]